لنگش، خطری روز افزون در گله های شیری
محورهای موضوعی :
احمدرضا محمدنیا
1
*
,
امیر نجاتی
2
1 - عضو هیئت علمی
2 - دانشجو دانشگاه مک گیل
کلید واژه: لنگش, گاو شیری, زیان اقتصادی, شناسایی لنگش, صنعت گاو شیری,
چکیده مقاله :
لنگش به عنوان یکی از مهمترین عوامل زیان اقتصادی در صنعت دامپروری مورد توجه است. این عارضه نه تنها باعث ایجاد درد و ناراحتی در حیوان شده بلکه از طریق کاهش آسایش دام و عوارضی که به شکل مستقیم و غیر مستقیم به دام وارد میکند، منجر به کاهش تولیدات دامی میگردد. در این مقاله ضمن نگرشی کلی به وضعیت صنعت دامپروری در جهان و ایران و ضرورتهایی که این صنعت ایجاد مینماید، نگاه کلی به زیانهای اقتصادی لنگش، مشکلات آسایش ایجاد شده توسط لنگش و مشکلاتی که در سلامت دام حاصل از رخداد لنگش ایجاد میگردد، از اهم نکات مورد بحث در این مقاله است. در نهایت تلاش گردیده است تا نگاه ویژهای به ثبت اطلاعات و ارزیابی آن در مبحث مراقبت از سم شود و راه کارهای ثبت اطلاعات با تشریح مبانی کالبد شناختی آن مورد توجه قرار گیرد. نگارندگان بر این باورند که تنها در سایه ثبت اطلاعات درست و کارآمد است که میتوان نسبت به ارزیابی آنچه گذشته، اقدام نمود و برای آنچه پیشرو است برنامه ریزی کرد.
Lameness is one of the most important factors causing economic loss in dairy farms. Pain and discomfort following lameness are the main causes of direct and indirect economic losses. Overall situation of dairy farming and dairy products over the world and Iran is reviewed in this article. A general look at economic loss cycles, different discomfort and health issues that may caused by lameness are the main topics that were reviewed in this article. Data recording is one of the most important factors that should be considered in any analysis. Current methods of data recording in hoof trimming chute, including paper works and usage of excel sheets and other software were reviewed. General concepts of Farsi language android application for hoof data recording introduced and analysed.
منابع
1. Ritchie H and Roser M. Meat and Dairy Production. 2017 (cited 2020 1.2.2020).
2. Faye, B. and G. Konuspayeva, The sustainability challenge to the dairy sector–The growing importance of non-cattle milk production worldwide. International dairy journal, 2012. 24(2): p. 50-56.
3. Mundial, B., Module 4-Smallholder dairy production. Agriculture Investment Sourcebook. 2013, Washington: Autor. Recuperado de http://www. worldbank. org/en/topic/agriculture.
4. Beldman, A., et al., Dairy farming and dairy industry in Iran. 2017: Wageningen Economic Research.
5. Cook, N.B., et al., Management characteristics, lameness, and body injuries of dairy cattle housed in high-performance dairy herds in Wisconsin. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016. 99(7): p. 5879-5891.
6. Solano, L., et al., Prevalence of lameness and associated risk factors in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns. Journal of dairy science, 2015. 98(10): p. 6978-6991.
7. Leach, K.A., et al., Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms. Research in Veterinary Science, 2010. 89(2): p. 311-317.
8. Kossaibati, M.A. and R.J. Esslemont, The costs of production diseases in dairy herds in England. The Veterinary Journal, 1997. 154(1): p. 41-51.
9. von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., et al., Benchmarking cow comfort on North American freestall dairies: Lameness, leg injuries, lying time, facility design, and management for high-producing Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2012. 95(12): p. 7399-7408.
10. Van Nuffel, A., et al., Lameness Detection in Dairy Cows: Part 1. How to Distinguish between Non-Lame and Lame Cows Based on Differences in Locomotion or Behavior. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2015. 5(3): p. 838-860.
11. J. Shearer and S.V. Amstel, Manual of Foot Care in Cattle, ed. n. ed. 2013: Hoard's Dairyman, Fort Atkinson.
12. Dolecheck, K. and J. Bewley, Animal board invited review: Dairy cow lameness expenditures, losses and total cost. 2018. 12: p. 1-13.
13. Whay, H.R. and J.K. Shearer, The Impact of Lameness on Welfare of the Dairy Cow. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 2017. 33(2): p. 153-164.
14. Dunthorn, J., et al., Predictive models of lameness in dairy cows achieve high sensitivity and specificity with force measurements in three dimensions. Journal of Dairy Research, 2015. 82(4): p. 391-399.
15. David Fraser, et al., A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare, 1997. 6: p. 187-205.
16. von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., et al., Invited review: The welfare of dairy cattle—Key concepts and the role of science. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009. 92(9): p. 4101-4111.
17. Ózsvári, L., Economic Cost of Lameness in Dairy Cattle Herds. 2017. 6: p. 00176.
18. Whay, H.R., et al., The influence of lesion type on the duration ofhyperalgesia associated with hindlimb lameness in dairy cattle. The Veterinary Journal, 1998. 156(1): p. 23-29.
19. Solano, L., et al., Associations between lying behavior and lameness in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016. 99(3): p. 2086-2101.
20. Gomez, A. and N.B. Cook, Time budgets of lactating dairy cattle in commercial freestall herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 2010. 93(12): p. 5772-5781.
21. Ito, K., et al., Lying behavior as an indicator of lameness in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2010. 93(8): p. 3553-3560.
22. Coetzee, J.F., et al., An Update on the Assessment and Management of Pain Associated with Lameness in Cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 2017. 33(2): p. 389-411.
23. Leach, K.A., et al., The effects of early treatment for hindlimb lameness in dairy cows on four commercial UK farms. The Veterinary Journal, 2012. 193(3): p. 626-632.
24. Espejo, L.A., M.I. Endres, and J.A. Salfer, Prevalence of Lameness in High-Producing Holstein Cows Housed in Freestall Barns in Minnesota. Journal of Dairy Science, 2006. 89(8): p. 3052-3058.
25. Egger-Danner C, ICAR Claw Health Atlas. First edition ed. ICAR Technical Series. 2015, Italy: ICAR, Via Savoia 78, Scala A, Int. 3, 00191, Rome, Italy.
26. Solano, L., et al., Prevalence and distribution of foot lesions in dairy cattle in Alberta, Canada. Journal of dairy science, 2016. 99(8): p. 6828-6841.